@DissidentKitty@radical.town @substack
1/2
Yes, I agree, that is the case more often than not
BUT
I genuinely don't see the ideas I outlined above as supporting the notion that some people are *inherently* better than some others: that claim presupposes an objective, universally recognized set of values, independent from any one person - which isn't at all compatible with Stirner's extreme emphasis on the subjective nature of morals.
CONTINUES >>>