People, community, the long struggle between the
#openweb and
#dotconsThis is a mess that has been clear to see for 20 years, but people keep falling into the same traps instead of stepping off the cycle of control. We had something, we lost it, and we are still refusing to face why.
Let’s use
#Failbook as a practical example of a monster that devours our dreams, fifteen years ago, the writing was already on the wall,
#failbook and the
#dotcons would eat everything. It wasn’t some grand conspiracy, just basic power and control dynamics. People knew this. They saw the cage being built around them, yet walked in willingly. Why? Because in the small picture, it was “easier” to stay inside than to step outside. They thought they were users, but they were being used. Every attempt to “fix”
#failbook, the endless ethical tech debates, the “kinder, fairer” alternatives, the
#NGO-funded projects promising “a better social network”, misses the core issue: You don’t fix a monster. You stop feeding it and walk away.
This is where the religious metaphor fits, people don’t want atheism (the
#openweb), they just want a nicer god (ethical
#dotcons). They still kneel before centralized power, just hoping for a softer whip. We need to stop worshipping the digital feudal lords and start building something else entirely. One path is to reboot the original
#openwebTo do this we need some social history: The
#openweb was murdered, and no one faced the consequences, we need a truth and reconciliation process for what happened to the
#openweb. Why? Because people refuse to learn from history, and that means they keep making the same mistakes. Look at the waves of migration from open to closed over the last two decades:
The rise of blogs and open publishing (2000s) → The pull into social media walled gardens (2010s)
The rise of the federated web (2000s, early 2010s) → The collapse into corporate-owned silos (late 2010s, 2020s)
The rebirth of the Fediverse (Mastodon, PeerTube, Lemmy, etc.) → Now being co-opted by NGOs and
#mainstreaming interests
Each time, the excuse is different, but the result is the same, we hand over power, they take control, we lose everything. Until we face the fact that we let this happen, that we were complicit, this cycle won’t stop. Every time we fail to call it what it is, the blood-letting/stains keep coming back.
The problem with
#NGO and Co-op models, people love to push the same “solutions” that failed before. Pushing a voluntary project into a hard “not-for-profit” structure kills it, this happened again and again. Look at
#indymedia. It worked because it was messy, decentralized, built from the ground up. Run by volunteers, not controlled by a central authority. Rooted in the activist base, not an
#NGO-funded agenda. Then came the push to “formalize” it, and what happened?
Funding fights, bureaucracy, infighting.
Projects being hijacked or forced into rigid structures.
Most of the co-op/NGO media projects collapsed.
There is nothing wrong with people building not-for-profit media, but stop forcing voluntary activism into structures that will kill it. The old mistakes aren’t new solutions. They are just mistakes waiting to happen again.
The
#OMN and the need for diversity of strategies, the
#OMN is built on a simple idea, diversity of strategies is strength. We need:
Commercial models where they work.
Not-for-profit structures where they make sense.
Voluntary activism as the foundation.
Then the basic
#4opens of them linking to each other. What we don’t need is people using their own narrow worldview as a
#BLOCK on other approaches in the guise of “helping”. This happens all the time, with the
#NGO crowd that wants everything formalized, structured, and professionalized, they see grassroots messiness as a problem. The geeks want everything to be purely about the tech, ignoring the social and political realities. The politicos want everything to align with their ideology, even when that means excluding actual working solutions. These proxy fights kill the meany projects before they even start.
The solution is not ideological purity, it’s pragmatic diversity. If we want to break the cycle, we need to stop repeating the same mistakes, stop blocking each other, link and start building with what we have
#KISSOne path to this, that needs support
https://opencollective.com/open-media-network
. The truth is, we completely messed up the last decade of tech development. And yes, we lost a critical battle around 2008. What followed was a lost decade where 
![op de spandoeken boven het stoplicht staat:
barabaraya
digusur [uitgezet] ik denk dat er tidak [niet] voor staat
en
kuasa rakyat [mensenmacht]
relawan negar [Vrijwilligers van de staat]
#indonesiagelap](https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/114/079/470/235/999/610/original/122a8c8c27f15627.jpeg "op de spandoeken boven het stoplicht staat:
barabaraya
digusur [uitgezet] ik denk dat er tidak [niet] voor staat
en
kuasa rakyat [mensenmacht]
relawan negar [Vrijwilligers van de staat]
#indonesiagelap")
